Consortium | Artificial Intelligence Risk Navigator (AIRN)

Shadow AI growth (unknown tools + unknown data exposure)

Checklist fatigue (controls that don’t match the real architecture)

Vendor chaos (55+ “AI security” vendors with overlapping claims)

No clear accountability (engineering vs security vs GRC)

FOUNDATION

Risk & Control Framework

53 prescriptive capabilities organized by WHO implements (Application, Infrastructure, Governance) rather than abstract categories. Covers 8 risk categories and 41 specific threats.

ASSESSMENT

Architecture-Aware Scoring

Two-stagemethodology separates inherent risk (data sensitivity, user trust, autonomy)from architecture amplification (agents, RAG, APIs) to prioritize risks thatapply to your implementation.

INTELLIGENCE

Automated Vendor Research

AI agents analyze 60+ vendors across 40+ data points per vendor. Maps capabilities to risks, identifies gaps, validates claims, and performs complementarity analysis to prevent redundant purchases.

STRATEGY

Platform-First Matching

Maximizes existing Azure, AWS, CrowdStrike, or Palo Alto investments before recommending new vendors. Aligns to your preferences (centralized vs. distributed, build vs. buy, platform vs. best-of-breed).

Risk-Driven Priorities

Architecture-aware assessment ensures you address risks that actually apply to your implementation, not generic checklists

Maximize Platform ROI

Identify 60-70% capability coverage from existing Azure, AWS, CrowdStrike, or Palo Alto before new procurement.

Accelerate Vendor Selection

Skip months of RFPs—get prioritized vendor shortlists with complementarity analysis to prevent redundant spending.

Strategic Alignment

Recommendations align to your organizational preferences: centralized vs. distributed, build vs. buy, platform consolidation.

Deploying
GenAI
Applications

Moving from pilot to production and need to know which security controls to build into your architecture before lock-in costs millions.

Navigating Framework Overload

Overwhelmed by NIST AI RMF, OWASP Top 10 LLM, and MITRE ATLAS and need vendor recommendations, not another checklist.

Optimizing Security
Stack

Invested in Azure, AWS, CrowdStrike, or Palo Alto but unsure which GenAI security capabilities you already own vs. need to buy.

Architecture-Aware Risk Assessment

Prioritized Implementation Roadmap

Capability Gap Analysis

Prioritized Vendor Shortlist

Vendor Validation Playbook

Fast-Track Implementation Path

Architecture-Aware Risk Assessment

Your personalized risk score based on 5 dimensions: data sensitivity, user trust, autonomy level, decision criticality, and deployment model—plus architecture amplification from agents, RAG, APIs, and tool integrations. See which of 41 risks actually apply to your implementation.

people having a meeting at a large conference table

Prioritized Implementation Roadmap

A control plan mapped to the responsible team (Application/Infrastructure/Governance) with clear ownership. Know exactly which capabilities developers need to build in, which IT Security deploys centrally, and which leadership enforces through policy.

Capability Gap Analysis

Discover what's covered vs. missing across your entire security stack. See which GenAI security capabilities your existing Azure, AWS, CrowdStrike, or Palo Alto platforms already provide—typically 60-70% coverage before new procurement.

three people working together on a computer

Prioritized Vendor Shortlist

Shortlisted vendors aligned to your required capabilities, architecture realities, and organizational preferences (centralized vs. distributed, build vs. buy, platform vs. best-of-breed). Includes complementarity analysis to prevent redundant purchases.

Vendor Validation Playbook

Actionable demo questions to validate vendor claims quickly. Know exactly what to ask in vendor calls to confirm capabilities match your needs—sorted by validation priority (Critical/High/Medium) so you focus on what matters.

woman smiling wearing headphones and working on a laptop

Fast-Track Implementation Path

A phased approach that emphasizes speed and ROI: configure existing platforms first (Days 1-30), evaluate targeted vendors for gaps (Days 31-90), and defer nice-to-have capabilities until proven ROI. Maximize existing investments before new spending.

In an era where every organization is racing to deploy GenAI, Consortium ensures your security strategy enables innovation rather than blocking it. We transform abstract security frameworks into investment-grade vendor strategies—revealing that most organizations already own 60-70% of required capabilities through existing platforms. Our approach eliminates redundant spending, accelerates vendor selection from quarters to weeks, and provides board-ready justification for every security investment tied directly to quantified risk reduction.

Turn Security from Cost Center to Competitive Advantage.

Artificial Intelligence Risk Navigator (AIRN)

Transform abstract security frameworks into concrete, actionable vendor strategies aligned to your organization's unique risk profile and architecture.

The Challenge

Stop Drowning in Frameworks

Why It Matters

The Stakes Are High

our approach